Back to Glossary

attempted cheating, academic misconduct

An attempted cheating offence is any attempt to influence the result of an examination through unauthorised aids, impersonation, or other deception. Examination regulations typically prescribe sanctions ranging from grading the attempt as failed to exclusion from the examination.

German legal term from examination and disciplinary law; 'täuschen' means the misrepresentation of false facts.

Täuschung, unerlaubte Hilfsmittel, Unregelmäßigkeit in der Prüfung

attempted cheating, academic misconduct

What counts as cheating?

This covers cheat sheets, unauthorised notes, a phone or smartwatch carried into the examination room, collusion with other candidates, plagiarism in written work, and false statements in the admission process. An attempt is sufficient; success is not required. In many regulations, a phone left in a pocket rather than handed in is already enough, and passing on examination questions to later sittings also regularly falls under this heading.

What are the consequences?

Licensing regulations and university examination regulations differ in their sanctions; the Regulation on the Licensing of Veterinarians, for example, lists them in § 15 under the heading Irregularities. At university level, state law applies in addition: under § 63(5) of the Higher Education Act of North Rhine-Westphalia, a deliberate breach of cheating rules can be punished as a regulatory offence with a fine of up to €50,000, and in cases of repeated or serious cheating, compulsory exmatriculation is also possible. If cheating only comes to light later, withdrawal of the examination decision under the provisions on unlawful administrative acts is a possibility — at federal level § 48 of the Administrative Procedures Act. Which time limit and which requirements apply follows from the applicable examination regulations and state law; legal advice is advisable when such allegations arise.

How is the allegation investigated?

The candidate must be heard, the facts documented, and the evidence secured. Errors in this process are a classic point of attack for a challenge to the examination decision, since the sanction is also an administrative act and must be reasoned. In many regulations the candidate may complete the work first; the decision is made afterwards in formal proceedings. Those who merely deny the allegation in general terms without setting out what happened forfeit this opportunity.

What does this mean for students in EU countries?

Universities in Bulgaria, Hungary, Croatia, or the Baltic states operate with their own honour codes and disciplinary regulations, sometimes with immediate exmatriculation. A documented incident there goes into the student file, and German licensing authorities also examine reliability and professional integrity under § 3(1) of the Federal Medical Act when assessing the licence application. This is a point many underestimate.

Personally guided by Marcel Kloos, founder of Medschool Experts, from your first consultation to the start of your career.

Book a free consultation

Free and no obligation.